Chapter
1 in the Knobel and Lankshear reading discussed samples of the 2 levels of new
literacies research. The question
these authors discussed in this chapter was what makes these practices “new”
and “literacies”. (Page 11) I think the fact that most of the examples of
literacy are technology based is what makes these practices “new”. Blogging and podcasts are definitely
‘new’ to me! To me, anything that
you can read and can learn from should be considered “literacies”. As the
picture I chose to use shows, I am willing to use any ‘literacies’ I can find
that will help my students becoming interested in learning! Whether it is comic books or stories
about video games, nonfiction texts, or blogs, I am willing and excited to give
it a try. I just want my students
to be actively engaged in their own learning.
I
enjoyed the section on ‘Meaningful content’ of literacies. I would love to use this in my
classroom as a teaching point when we are studying research topics. The idea that people write and post
information on the Internet to express themselves will be a good discussion
starter! Letting my students know
that people write to feel connected to someone or something is a great concept
for them to learn. Or it may be
just the opposite of that. They
may want to express their feelings of solitude to the world by writing. Informing students of these types of
literacies will be a powerful addition to the writing and research section of
our class.

Crystal, I totally agree "anything that you can read and can learn from should be considered “literacies”." I tried to say this in my blog, but I am not so sure it came across!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that informing students of "new" literacies is powerful. As we advance with technology, it is considered "new". Blogging, wikis, and participation over publishing is new to me. Participation amongst one another does help them feel connected.
ReplyDelete